Fix-IT.org - The source that feeds your technological needs.
Header
HeaderGo back to the HomepageHeaderAbout UsHeaderContact UsHeaderHeader
Header
ForumsHeaderReviewsHeaderGlossaryHeaderSite HelpHeader
Header
filler
Image for Ad Block
Image for Ad Block
Image for Ad Block
Image for Ad Block

Go Back   Fix-It Forums > Hardware-Related > Overclocking, Cooling, and Tweaking
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-07-2005, 10:51 AM   #1
proxops-pete
Senior Level Support
 
proxops-pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,378
The overclocking ventures of Peter

Well... with my new nforce2 Ultra board, I was able to achieve 12 x 166 (2 GHz) stable! Then I really wanted to push my unlocked mobile CPU so I got 2x PC3500 Kingston HyperX 2-3-3-7 memory and off I went!

And boy, am I glad to have done so! I am now running at 10 x 220 (2.2 GHz)!! Wooohoo! At 2 GHz, SuperPi took 54 sec, and now at 2.2 GHz, it takes 47 sec! I am quite happy...

This should get me by for some time... and at least when I upgrade, I can take the memory along. I know it's not news to lots of you... Just wanted to share my joys...
proxops-pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2005, 11:41 AM   #2
gurutoo
Level 3 Support
 
gurutoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 762
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by proxops-pete
Well... with my new nforce2 Ultra board, I was able to achieve 12 x 166 (2 GHz) stable! Then I really wanted to push my unlocked mobile CPU so I got 2x PC3500 Kingston HyperX 2-3-3-7 memory and off I went!

And boy, am I glad to have done so! I am now running at 10 x 220 (2.2 GHz)!! Wooohoo! At 2 GHz, SuperPi took 54 sec, and now at 2.2 GHz, it takes 47 sec! I am quite happy...

This should get me by for some time... and at least when I upgrade, I can take the memory along. I know it's not news to lots of you... Just wanted to share my joys...

If you're happy, we're happy Pete!
gurutoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2005, 03:08 PM   #3
proxops-pete
Senior Level Support
 
proxops-pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,378
Thanks Guru!
proxops-pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2005, 03:10 PM   #4
jester22c
Level 3 Support
 
jester22c's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 948
Congrats on your first adventure in the world of O/C What were your stock speeds btw? Temps?
jester22c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2005, 03:41 PM   #5
proxops-pete
Senior Level Support
 
proxops-pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,378
I don't know about temps yet... but it's not my first adventure...
It's an XP 2000+ Mobile that runs at 1.67 GHz / FSB 133 MHz x 2. I've run it at 1.9 GHz / FSB 150 MHz x 2 for at least a year, mainly due to my poor MSI KT3 Ultra mobo's limited capabilities.

Recently, I upgraded to Epox 8RDA3+Pro (nForce2 Ultra) and with the same previous memory (PC2700), I ran it up to 2 GHz (12.5 x 166 MHz). Then I just acquired some PC3500 memory (1 GB Kingston HyperX CAS 2) and boosted it to 2.2 GHz (10 x 220 MHz).
proxops-pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2005, 04:20 PM   #6
jester22c
Level 3 Support
 
jester22c's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 948
ahhh well in that case congrats on the nice upgrade!
jester22c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2005, 11:14 PM   #7
r'aggrostic
Level 2 Support
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: WA
Posts: 303
Hey Pete--next try to tighten up to 2-2-2-10 or 11 and see if it still passes your stability tests. Just another small step that might improve performance. The most important is cas=2, but the rest does help if the ram is up to it.

:smile:
r'aggrostic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2005, 11:29 PM   #8
proxops-pete
Senior Level Support
 
proxops-pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,378
So what does that exactly improve?? I'm hesitant to lower the other times...
proxops-pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2005, 01:04 PM   #9
r'aggrostic
Level 2 Support
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: WA
Posts: 303
I'm not a ram expert, but ras-to-cas represents a delay in clock cycles, just like cas ratio. (latency) So it's better to have 'em tight if your setup allows. It won't make a huge difference, maybe a few points in 3dmark or a few fps in some games maybe. If it makes your machine flakey you can always relax them again.
r'aggrostic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2005, 02:15 AM   #10
proxops-pete
Senior Level Support
 
proxops-pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,378
If it's just few pts and fps, I'd rather leave it as is... I was trying to increase the multiplier to 11x and 10.5x both with no success... I had to reset the Bios twice... I'm happy with 10 x 220... no need for me to get greedy and ruin what I have.
proxops-pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Overclocking FAQ (and newbie guide) jester22c Overclocking, Cooling, and Tweaking 9 07-27-2004 10:37 PM
The Fix-It.org Overclocking Database eshbach Overclocking, Cooling, and Tweaking 13 06-14-2004 05:09 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Footer
FooterFooterReviewsFooterGlossaryFooterSite HelpFooter
FooterTop of Page
sponsor the site sponsor the site Free Computer Support