![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Level Support
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,378
|
The overclocking ventures of Peter
Well... with my new nforce2 Ultra board, I was able to achieve 12 x 166 (2 GHz) stable! Then I really wanted to push my unlocked mobile CPU so I got 2x PC3500 Kingston HyperX 2-3-3-7 memory and off I went!
And boy, am I glad to have done so! I am now running at 10 x 220 (2.2 GHz)!! Wooohoo! At 2 GHz, SuperPi took 54 sec, and now at 2.2 GHz, it takes 47 sec! I am quite happy... This should get me by for some time... and at least when I upgrade, I can take the memory along. I know it's not news to lots of you... Just wanted to share my joys... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Level 3 Support
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 762
|
Quote:
If you're happy, we're happy Pete! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Level Support
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,378
|
Thanks Guru!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Level 3 Support
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 948
|
Congrats on your first adventure in the world of O/C
What were your stock speeds btw? Temps? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Level Support
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,378
|
I don't know about temps yet... but it's not my first adventure...
![]() It's an XP 2000+ Mobile that runs at 1.67 GHz / FSB 133 MHz x 2. I've run it at 1.9 GHz / FSB 150 MHz x 2 for at least a year, mainly due to my poor MSI KT3 Ultra mobo's limited capabilities. Recently, I upgraded to Epox 8RDA3+Pro (nForce2 Ultra) and with the same previous memory (PC2700), I ran it up to 2 GHz (12.5 x 166 MHz). Then I just acquired some PC3500 memory (1 GB Kingston HyperX CAS 2) and boosted it to 2.2 GHz (10 x 220 MHz). ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Level 3 Support
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 948
|
ahhh well in that case congrats on the nice upgrade!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Level 2 Support
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: WA
Posts: 303
|
Hey Pete--next try to tighten up to 2-2-2-10 or 11 and see if it still passes your stability tests. Just another small step that might improve performance. The most important is cas=2, but the rest does help if the ram is up to it.
:smile: |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Level Support
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,378
|
So what does that exactly improve?? I'm hesitant to lower the other times...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Level 2 Support
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: WA
Posts: 303
|
I'm not a ram expert, but ras-to-cas represents a delay in clock cycles, just like cas ratio. (latency) So it's better to have 'em tight if your setup allows. It won't make a huge difference, maybe a few points in 3dmark or a few fps in some games maybe. If it makes your machine flakey you can always relax them again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Level Support
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,378
|
If it's just few pts and fps, I'd rather leave it as is... I was trying to increase the multiplier to 11x and 10.5x both with no success... I had to reset the Bios twice... I'm happy with 10 x 220... no need for me to get greedy and ruin what I have.
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Overclocking FAQ (and newbie guide) | jester22c | Overclocking, Cooling, and Tweaking | 9 | 07-27-2004 10:37 PM |
| The Fix-It.org Overclocking Database | eshbach | Overclocking, Cooling, and Tweaking | 13 | 06-14-2004 05:09 AM |